some text
Marina Abramović, Rhythm 0, 1974
"To test the limits of the relationship between performer and audience, Abramović developed one of her most challenging (and best-known) performances. She assigned a passive role to herself, with the public being the force which would act on her.
Abramović had placed upon a table 72 objects that people were allowed to use (a sign informed them) in any way that they chose. Some of these were objects that could give pleasure, while others could be wielded to inflict pain, or to harm her. Among them were a rose, a feather, honey, a whip, scissors, a scalpel, a gun and a single bullet. For six hours the artist allowed the audience members to manipulate her body and actions.
Initially, members of the audience reacted with caution and modesty, but as time passed (and the artist remained impassive) people began to act more aggressively. As Abramović described it later:
“What I learned was that… if you leave it up to the audience, they can kill you.” … “I felt really violated: they cut up my clothes, stuck rose thorns in my stomach, one person aimed the gun at my head, and another took it away. It created an aggressive atmosphere. After exactly 6 hours, as planned, I stood up and started walking toward the audience. Everyone ran away, to escape an actual confrontation.”

Marina Abramović, Rhythm 0, 1974

"To test the limits of the relationship between performer and audience, Abramović developed one of her most challenging (and best-known) performances. She assigned a passive role to herself, with the public being the force which would act on her.

Abramović had placed upon a table 72 objects that people were allowed to use (a sign informed them) in any way that they chose. Some of these were objects that could give pleasure, while others could be wielded to inflict pain, or to harm her. Among them were a rose, a feather, honey, a whip, scissors, a scalpel, a gun and a single bullet. For six hours the artist allowed the audience members to manipulate her body and actions.

Initially, members of the audience reacted with caution and modesty, but as time passed (and the artist remained impassive) people began to act more aggressively. As Abramović described it later:

“What I learned was that… if you leave it up to the audience, they can kill you.” … “I felt really violated: they cut up my clothes, stuck rose thorns in my stomach, one person aimed the gun at my head, and another took it away. It created an aggressive atmosphere. After exactly 6 hours, as planned, I stood up and started walking toward the audience. Everyone ran away, to escape an actual confrontation.”

Posted on May 26th, 2012
876 notes
  1. secretdoortoheaven reblogged this from thehandhasfivefingers
  2. pierjumpers reblogged this from thehandhasfivefingers
  3. furraldo reblogged this from electricalascension
  4. omnuspowered reblogged this from thehandhasfivefingers
  5. cenotype reblogged this from thehandhasfivefingers and added:
    Humanity
  6. comicchi reblogged this from electricalascension
  7. snupedawg reblogged this from electricalascension
  8. electricalascension reblogged this from thehandhasfivefingers and added:
    that’s disgusting i’d shoved them all out of the way and hugged her and try to fix her wounds. those people should be...
  9. stormbug reblogged this from thehandhasfivefingers
  10. thatgirlyouneverknew reblogged this from now-anywhere and added:
    Marina Abramović, Rhythm 0, 1974 “To test the limits of the relationship between performer and audience, Abramović...
  11. photographedhippo reblogged this from now-anywhere
  12. now-anywhere reblogged this from garden-bed
  13. goodbyeenglandcoveredinsnow reblogged this from thehandhasfivefingers
  14. solescribe reblogged this from posh-lost
  15. heysuugah reblogged this from thehandhasfivefingers and added:
    M A R I N A.
  16. rowslotus reblogged this from damnlibby
  17. cutenekololi reblogged this from thehandhasfivefingers
  18. holyhowl reblogged this from jon-ald-o
  19. failforever reblogged this from femslash
  20. atrabile reblogged this from horologists
  21. horologists reblogged this from watchpugs